9 Codility alternatives for hiring the best developers

Why consider an alternative to Codility?

There’s no doubt that Codility is a well-established platform for skill evaluations in the tech industry. However, it has a few limitations that may make other options a better fit.

Let’s look at some of Codility’s drawbacks:

1. Manual library imports are required. There’s no automatic function, which costs you more time.

2. It can be challenging to create customized tests. Unlike other technical skill-testing platforms, you need to make your algorithms yourself, which also takes time.

3. There’s no visible/displayable timer for candidates. Candidates may rush through questions or answer them too slowly without knowing how much time they have left on their test.

4. Test questions might alienate some candidates. Since Codility assessment questions are essentially algorithm-based brainteasers, they may not accurately assess a candidate’s more practical, real-life coding skills.

5. They’re missing non-technical skill tests. Web developers need to know their tech, but that’s not all it takes to succeed in the role. Personality tests, cognitive assessments, and other soft skills are also crucial to finding someone who would fit the position and the company culture.

If any of these limitations have you second-guessing using a Codility test, keep reading and discover our reviews of Codility alternatives.

The 9 Codility alternatives to enhance your hiring process

So, before we take a look at why an alternative to Codility might be better, here’s a quick comparison table that compares all of your available options:

Now, let’s take a closer look at these Codility competitors below.

The 9 best Codility alternatives reviewed

Ready to find a better skills assessment platform to help you fill developer positions in your company?

Here are some of the best alternatives to Codility that you can use to evaluate candidate skills and hire the right individuals for your team.

1. TestGorilla

Best for teams that need technical and non-technical assessments in one platform

Where Codility fails to offer a wide range of assessments, TestGorilla has plenty to offer in its test library. TestGorilla is a comprehensive skills testing platform that equips hiring managers and recruiters with the best tools to assess candidates and shortlist the best programmers and coders available.

One of the best things about TestGorilla’s platform is its outstanding user experience. Monitoring the results of your candidates’ tests is effortless and intuitive, as is creating custom coding questions. You can also integrate the platform with various applicant tracking systems, which makes applicant tracking easy.

In addition to critical features like one-way interviewing options, the platform offers a range of coding tests, from Python to C# coding tests. It also includes different types and levels (entry-level and intermediate) for each programming language test. 

For example, here’s what a question from the TypeScript (Coding): Intermediate-Level Algorithms test looks like:

TestGorilla is the best alternative to Codility because it offers personality and soft skills tests in addition to technical ones, enabling you to get a comprehensive assessment of candidates. Here are some of the other tests that you may use to hire a well-rounded developer:

Since all tests are backed by subject-matter experts, even recruiters with no prior knowledge of a subject can confidently hire tech talent while avoiding hiring biases that emerge when test results aren’t the deciding factor. Take Lima Innovation Lab’s (LILAB) experience with TestGorilla, for example.

LILAB’s biggest hiring problem was its human resources managers' lack of technical knowledge. Unfortunately, this made screening potential candidates difficult and resulted in a high dismissal rate within the first three months of hiring.

Once it began to incorporate programming and personality tests from TestGorilla’s test library into its selection process, though, LILAB saw a significant difference. After six months, the company found it was retaining more than 90% of its hired candidates.

With the expenses associated with recruitment and retainment, organizations can save a lot of money using a platform like TestGorilla. See the difference it can make for your company using our recruitment ROI calculator.

Although TestGorilla provides its users with many excellent features, it may not have everything you need for your hiring process. You can’t conduct live video interviews or peer coding sessions within the platform to see how candidates work collaboratively.

However, if you don’t mind using other apps to fill these roles, TestGorilla is a solid choice as a comprehensive assessment tool for web developer skills.

Pricing: Pricing starts from $142 per month (billed annually) for the Core plan, which includes the full library of 350+ tests and 2 full access seats. TestGorilla uses a credit-based model where 1 credit covers one candidate's skills test. A free plan with 10 credits per month is also available.

Rating: 4.5/5, 1400+ reviews (G2)

See why TestGorilla is the best Codility alternative

With the option to create customized assessments in addition to its extensive library of 350+ soft and hard skill tests, TestGorilla gives you a comprehensive look at developer skill sets

Get your free live demo

2. DevSkiller

Best for companies that want real-world coding tasks mirroring actual job scenarios

Like TestGorilla, the DevSkiller talent assessment platform enables non-technical HR professionals and tech recruiters to conduct bias-free technical interviews online. Since unconscious biases can interfere with recruiting and retention efforts, finding ways to combat them can be critical to a successful hire.

What’s unique about the DevSkiller platform is its RealLifeTesting methodology, which ensures that the tests reflect the conditions under which your candidates would be working in the open position. It measures the real-world job performance and coding skills of your candidates.

With DevSkiller, you can quickly test candidates of different seniority levels and various job-specific skills for different developer roles. There are tests for everyone from software engineers to mobile developers and full-stack developers. 

However, none of these assessments test for soft skills, which is one of the main reasons hiring managers look for Codility competitors in the first place. Plus, its quality control process isn’t as rigorous as similar platforms. TestGorilla assessments, for example, go through a 28-step process before being added to the test library.

Pricing: Pricing starts from $499/mo (billed annually) for TalentScore

Rating: 4.7/5, 90+ reviews (G2)

3. iMocha

Best for enterprise teams needing AI-powered assessments across 2,000+ skills

Artificial intelligence powers the iMocha platform. Live coding interview capabilities, assessments that you can customize, and proctoring features make iMocha a comprehensive and user-friendly technical skills testing platform.

You can use iMocha to validate skills and upskill existing employees by creating tailor-made training courses that help them develop their weaker skills.

iMocha’s AI-powered candidate metrics aid hiring managers and recruiters in making data-driven decisions.

Its extensive library is impressive, featuring more than 2000 skills tests. The platform also offers a few ATS integrations to make applicant monitoring easy.

However, like the other Codility alternatives on this list, iMocha has limitations. You can’t edit multiple tests simultaneously on the platform, which can be time-consuming. It also doesn’t have a Culture Add test to help you identify candidates that both fit with and add to your company culture.

Pricing: iMocha’s prices are available upon request. They are customized to meet your recruitment needs, so your price may vary from another company’s. However, third parties report them starting at $400/month (billed annually).

Rating: 4.4/5, 250+ reviews (G2)

4. HackerRank

Best for high-volume engineering hiring with live coding interviews

Detecting plagiarism in candidates’ code submissions is simple with HackerRank thanks to its proctoring controls, but that’s not all there is to like about this platform.

Unlike Codility, HackerRank offers coding tests of various difficulties to assess candidate skills at every level. Plus, every talent assessment has been field-tested and validated by studies.

Code submissions take place on an interactive platform that integrates an interviewer scorecard and enables interviewers to import the code submitted by applicants for separate tasks. Even live interviewing is possible with HackerRank.

Despite all of these great features, a few things are missing from HackerRank’s platform that may cause you to look at other options. 

It has no cognitive ability tests, like a Critical Thinking test, which can give you insights into how candidates think. You can get an idea of what they know from their skills tests, but understanding candidate thought processes can help you determine if they’re the right fit for your team and the role.

HackerRank also lacks a candidate management feature, so you can’t track applications throughout the hiring process. Keeping candidate information organized from the test invitation to the job offer stage can help streamline the hiring process, making this feature a must-have for some hiring managers.

Pricing: Starter: $165/mo ($1,990/yr); Pro: $375/mo ($4,490/yr)

Rating: 4.7/5, 450+ reviews (G2)

5. CoderPad

Best for teams that want gamified, collaborative coding interviews

With 78% of individuals reporting that companies who use game-like elements during recruitment make them more desirable, CoderPad is worth your consideration. The standout feature of this technical assessment platform is that it offers recruiters gamified technical candidate screening. 

CoderPad lets you customize your questions effortlessly and choose from a broad selection of tests for different coding languages. You can also assign take-home projects to let candidates work independently, and the platform functions as an IDE to enable easy sharing of code between candidates and interviewers.

If you’re a non-technical recruiter, CoderPad is one option that makes recruitment simpler, more effective, and fun.

However, it's not the best talent assessment platform for everyone. It’s hard to gamify something like personality tests, so it's no surprise these are missing from CoderPad. Also, if you have a problem, the only way to contact their support team is through email, which can halt your hiring process if they don’t return your emails ASAP.

Pricing: CoderPad’s pricing starts from $80/mo (billed annually); $120/mo monthly

Rating: 4.4/5, 230+ reviews (G2)

6. TestDome

Best for small teams with low-volume, pay-per-candidate hiring

TestDome features more than 160 skill tests, all of which you can easily customize. They also offer a money-back guarantee if you find any answers to their skills tests online.

One of TestDome’s handy features is its test score automation. You don’t need to calculate scores manually, saving you time and helping you avoid human error when analyzing the performance of your candidates or making a candidate comparison.

Plus, their extensive test library enables you to assess various developer skills. Some programming languages and framework skills tests available on the TestDome platform include Ruby and PHP, just to name a few.

TestDome could benefit from a few extra features, though. It lacks 24/7 live support, which can disrupt your hiring process if you’re stuck waiting for a response. Like Codility, TestDome doesn’t offer personality tests, which can give hiring managers insights into how candidates may react in a developer role.

Pricing: Pricing ranges from $100 to $4,200 for 5 to 600 candidates.

Rating: 4.6/5, 200+ reviews (G2)

7. HackerEarth

Best for organizations that combine hackathons with technical screening

Another Codility alternative is HackerEarth. Its vast selection of tools makes candidate assessment for technical roles easy. The platform’s tools, which include coding assessments for screening and a real-time coding editor for interviews, can also facilitate the upskilling of your current software developer employees.

Monitoring your developer candidates’ test results and applications is easy with HackerEarth’s hiring workflow. Simply use its integration feature to track the results as you receive them.

You can also create custom questions to test your candidates thoroughly. Or, if you’re a non-technical recruiter, choose from more than 13,000 questions and more than 80 skills tests to assess candidates (even if you have limited knowledge of the subject you’re testing).

Although HackerEarth has many technical questions and tests in its library, it’s unfortunately missing dedicated soft skills assessments, similar to Codility. On G2, users also report occasionally encountering technical issues like glitches during tests, which can result in a negative candidate experience. This is why we suggest looking at HackerEarth alternatives before signing up.

Pricing: HackerEarth’s pricing starts from $209 per month.

Rating: 4.5/5, 330+ reviews (G2)

8. Mercer Mettl Assessments

Best for enterprises needing psychometric, aptitude, and coding assessments together

From planning your assessments to screening your candidates and preparing for interviews, Mercer Mettl is a quality platform that covers all the bases of skills-based hiring for developers, including psychometric, aptitude, and coding assessments.

If you’re a part of the 73% of organizations that feel responsible for developing their employees, Mercer Mettl may be a great match. Upskilling your organization’s workforce is simple with this platform.

First, you can use a technical skills test to determine your employees’ weaker skill sets. Then, use the data to create an in-depth training program that addresses these skills.

Unique to Mercer Mettl is their gamified online hackathon that features a leaderboard and can be used by recruiters and hiring managers to create a more engaging onboarding process. You can’t get this with a Codility online assessment test!

There’s a lot to like about Mercer Mettl, but it does share similar limitations to a few of the other platforms on our list. Not only is it missing a culture add test to see if candidates can align with and enhance your company culture, but there’s also no pricing information on its website. Personalized pricing is nice, but so is transparency.

Pricing: Prices are available upon request.

Rating: 4.4/5, 500+ reviews (G2)

Looking for more detailed product insights?

Read our comprehensive guide to compare the top talent assessment tools on the market.

Compare top tools

9. Adaface

Best for teams that want a chatbot-driven, conversational screening experience

From front-end to back-end, mobile to DevOps, databases, and other IT technical skills tests, Adaface offers a broad selection of assessments. The platform features more than 500 skill tests covering programming, cognitive ability, typing, and more.

Several specific programming skills tests are available on Adaface, including tests for everything from Python to JavaScript. You can also test framework knowledge with skill tests for Spring, React, and more. 

Although it does feature an extensive test library, there are a few downsides to Adaface, especially regarding pricing. First, there is no free plan. If you opt for the free trial, you must pay for credits to continue using the service. And you better use those credits within a year – they expire after that.

Pricing: Adaface’s pricing starts from $180 per year, credit-based (Individual: 12 credits)

Rating: 4.6/5, 40+ reviews (G2)

Make better skills-based hiring decisions with TestGorilla

Using a mix of personality, cognitive ability, and technical assessments can give you a more complete picture of candidate skill sets. Sign up for a Free forever account to elevate your hiring game today.

Start testing skills for free

Honorable mentions

This list only scratches the surface of the many skills testing platforms available, and new startups are popping up every day. Here are a few that didn’t quite make the cut but are still worth considering:

• Filtered: With integrations through GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab, Filtered has an outstanding authentication process to ensure every applicant is exactly who they say they are.

• CodeSignal: CodeSignal is built from the top down for high-volume hiring, so it’s worth considering if you plan on pre-screening many candidates at once, such as through university hiring.

• Testlify: Although it’s on the higher end of platforms pricing-wise, that’s primarily because of the quantity and variety of add-ons Testlify has available, such as API key access, analytics, and even the ability to test candidates under a white label.

When Codility is the better fit

Codility's strength is engineering-specific depth. If your hiring is exclusively for software engineering roles and you need:

• Assessment methodology backed by occupational psychologists and aligned to IEEE SWECOM/SWEBOK

• An in-assessment AI assistant you can enable/disable per test

• Similarity checks, behavioral signals, and risk scoring for integrity

• Adverse impact monitoring baked into the platform

...then Codility's focused approach may serve you better than a broader platform.

Where Codility is less suited: if you hire across both technical and non-technical roles (marketing, sales, customer service, operations), you will need a second platform for personality, cognitive, and culture-add assessments. That is where broader platforms like TestGorilla close the gap.

Codility pricing:

• Starter: $1,200/yr (120 invites, 1 user)

• Scale: ~$500/mo billed annually (300 invites, 3 users)

• Custom: quote only

• 80+ ATS integrations

Find the best developer for your organization with TestGorilla

As you can see, there’s a broad range of Codility alternatives to help you find the best developer for your team. Although this might mean that you’ve got a difficult choice to make, keep in mind that some of the ideal features of a technical skills testing platform are:

• Anti-cheating or proctoring features

• ATS integrations

• Video interviewing capabilities

• A large selection of hard and soft skills tests

• Customizable tests to match your brand

• Custom coding questions 

Fortunately, you can get all this and more with TestGorilla, making it the best alternative to Codility assessment tests. With options ranging from the Django test to the Windows Server Administration test, making skills-based hiring decisions is easy for any role.

Check out the TestGorilla demo today to see it in action.

Are you interested in creating your own assessment? See how easy it is in our product tour.

When you’re ready to start optimizing your recruitment process, sign up for a Free forever plan.

Codility alternatives: Frequently asked questions

What is the best alternative to Codility for hiring developers?

TestGorilla is the strongest all-round alternative because it combines coding assessments with personality, cognitive ability, and culture-add tests. For teams focused exclusively on engineering depth, HackerRank and CodeSignal are strong single-purpose options.

Is there a free Codility alternative?

Yes. TestGorilla, CoderPad, and HackerEarth all offer free plans. TestGorilla's free plan includes five essential skills tests and qualifying questions. CoderPad's free tier includes two interviews per month. HackerEarth offers five test invites and three interview invites per month on its free plan.

How does Codility pricing compare to alternatives?

Codility's Starter plan costs $1,200 per year for 120 assessment invites. TestGorilla starts at $142 per month (billed annually) with a free plan available. Pay-per-candidate options like TestDome start at $100 for five candidates. Several alternatives, including HackerEarth and CoderPad, offer limited free plans.

Can I use a Codility alternative for non-technical hiring?

Most Codility alternatives focus on technical assessment. TestGorilla is the main exception: it offers personality tests, cognitive ability assessments, culture-add tests, and role-specific evaluations for non-technical positions alongside its coding test library.