TestGorilla vs. Testinvite

Evaluating job applicants before inviting them for an interview can significantly improve the efficiency of your hiring process. 

Instead of wading through thousands of resumes or interviewing lots of unsuitable candidates, you can use pre-employment assessment tools to test applicants and create a talent pool. Assessments can measure an individual’s skills, personality, and suitability for a position.

TestGorilla and Testinvite are two such pre-employment assessment platforms. This review discusses their features and differences so you can decide which is right for your business.

• ✅ Sign up for a TestGorilla free plan

How does TestGorilla work? 

TestGorilla provides cutting-edge online pre-employment testing services that enable organizations to make data-driven hiring decisions. TestGorilla’s tests eliminate bias and prejudice from the recruitment process.

TestGorilla offers a wide range of more than 300 pre-employment tests that cater to different business needs. You can create custom assessments by combining up to five tests while personalizing the questions to fit job roles. 

All tests are thoroughly vetted through a 28-step quality-control process using the knowledge of subject-matter experts to guarantee reliable results.

TestGorilla also provides anti-cheating measures and quality-control checks to ensure that test results are precise and valid. With TestGorilla, businesses can have confidence that their hiring decisions are based on objective data and unbiased evaluations.

How does Testinvite work? 

Testinvite is a cloud-based online testing platform. Employers can create their own tests or select predesigned tests from a small marketplace. 

Testinvite is available in four languages (English, French, Spanish, and Turkish) with additional limited support for tests in six other languages.

Through an administration panel, hiring managers can track candidate login and test progress. Test results can be filtered based on criteria, and there’s a scorecard for a quick overview of candidate prowess.

Testinvite includes some anti-cheating measures, such as the option to record applicants’ screens and take webcam snapshots. It’s also possible to engage with candidates via live chat during their tests, which is useful for addressing any technical issues that may arise.

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Test libraries

When choosing a pre-employment testing platform, it’s essential to opt for a tool that provides a diverse range of tests and enables custom assessments with personalized questions. 

This approach lets HR teams tailor assessments so they can identify candidates that match their specific hiring needs.

TestGorilla’s test library

TestGorilla offers more than 300 fully customizable tests, making it an excellent option for recruiting in many industries. Tests can be taken in more than ten languages, with a wholly localized website. 

TestGorilla’s tests can assess:

• Situational judgment
• Programming skills
• Software skills
• Cognitive intelligence
• Language skills
• Personality
• Leadership
• Role-specific skills
• And much more

Testinvite’s test library

With Testinvite, you must purchase system credits to buy any predesigned tests. Testinvite has around 75 tests, with almost 30 of these in Turkish. The tests include:

• Numerical aptitude
• English language
• German language
• Critical thinking
• Coding
• Spatial reasoning
• Sales competency

There are also around four question packs you can purchase. These include six questions, typically designed to test IQ.

Test libraries: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
Cognitive ability tests	Yes	Yes
Situational judgment tests	Yes	No
Job-specific tests	Yes	No
Software tests	Yes	No
Programming tests (including coding challenges)	Yes	Yes
Language tests	Yes	Yes
Personality tests	Yes	Yes
Culture-add test	Yes	No
Your own custom tests	Yes	Yes
Custom questions per assessment	Yes	Yes
Test recommendations for each job role	Yes	No
Multiple tests per assessment	Yes	No

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Functionalities for hiring developers

When hiring developers, it’s helpful to ask candidates to complete general coding aptitude tests to demonstrate their technical skills and problem-solving abilities. 

It’s also common to test applicants on their knowledge of specific programming concepts and languages relevant to the position.

Hiring developers with TestGorilla

TestGorilla provides a range of tests that can assist in finding a suitable developer. These tests include algorithmic thinking,  debugging challenges, and language-specific concept challenges such as Java, C+, Ruby, Python, JavaScript, and more. 

TestGorilla can be used to evaluate an applicant’s expertise with development frameworks such as Django, Angular, and React. Additionally, TestGorilla offers personalized, recordable coding challenges that assess real-world problem-solving abilities. 

TestGorilla even automatically scores candidate results, resulting in increased efficiency and saved time.

Hiring developers with Testinvite

Testinvite has a few tests aimed at developers. These primarily assess the candidate’s knowledge of a particular programming language, such as Python or PHP. 

Several general competency tests are also available that could supplement this testing, such as numerical attention to detail and mental arithmetic. 

However, most of the time, those looking to hire developers with Testinvite will need to build their own tests from scratch.

Functionalities for hiring developers: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
Coding languages	JavaScript, Java, Python, PHP, C, C#, C++, SQL, Kotlin, Ruby, TypeScript, Go, R, Scala, and Swift	Python, PHP, CSS, JavaScript, React, Angular, Java, HTML, Vue.js
Web-development frameworks	Yes	Yes
Mobile-development frameworks	Yes	Yes
Algorithmic-thinking challenges	Yes	No
Debugging challenges	Yes	No
Language-specific concept challenges	Yes	Yes
Your own custom coding challenges	Yes	Yes
Code-playback function	Yes	N/A
Automated scoring	Yes	N/A

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Video interviews

A video interview is an effective tool for gaining in-depth knowledge about a candidate and shortlisting individuals to meet in person. Furthermore, it brings a human face to the selection process. 

While live video interviews are helpful, they are also time-consuming, so consider offering one-way video interviews with custom questions, as they’re convenient for both you and the candidate.

TestGorilla’s video interviews

TestGorilla provides customizable one-way video interviews that let you adjust the maximum response time and recording attempts. There’s also the opportunity for collaboration among your hiring team with shared comments on each interview. 

TestGorilla can record candidates’ screens during specific tests – such as coding challenges – for later playback. This provides valuable insights into the test-taker’s problem-solving, thought process, and time-management skills.

Testinvite’s video interviews

When creating a test, it’s possible to include a video in each question. This can be a file hosted on a third-party server, a YouTube video, or a video uploaded to Testinvite. 

The video window width and height can be set, and you can choose whether the candidate can pause or rewind the video during their test.

It’s also possible to use a test-taker’s webcam, so a custom assessment could feasibly be built where questions are posed to candidates via video and answered via webcam.

Video interviews: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
One-way video interview	Yes	Yes
Custom video questions	Yes	Yes
Recording of candidates’ attempts	Yes	Yes
Restrict maximum answer length	Yes	Yes
Recording and playback on any device	Yes	Yes
Rate and comment video answers	Yes	Yes

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Candidate experience and company branding

A favorable candidate experience can motivate potential hires to participate in your pre-employment evaluations, especially when they’re conveniently accessible via mobile-friendly assessments.

Furthermore, incorporating unique company branding elements like introductory and concluding videos while integrating your organization’s logo and colors into the assessment can enhance the candidate’s overall experience.

The candidate experience with TestGorilla

TestGorilla’s user-friendly platform makes testing convenient because candidates can access and complete assessments on any device without needing a separate login. 

To ensure candidates see the assessment through, TestGorilla maintains short testing durations of typically 15 minutes or less, with assessments averaging between 10 to 50 minutes.

TestGorilla also offers various branding features to help organizations maintain visibility throughout the assessment process. These include custom intro and outro videos, company logos and brand colors, and a link redirecting candidates to the company’s website at the end of their assessment.

The candidate experience with Testinvite

With Testinvite, organizations can customize the sign-in page that candidates first visit with company-specific text, images, and videos. 

Hiring managers can also set unique sign-in URLs on the Testinvite site (e.g. www.testinvite.com/organization/mycompanyname). Besides this, Testinvite doesn’t offer much in the way of customization. 

There’s a basic Testinvite app for Android but none for iOS. Candidates are generally expected to take their tests on a PC or Mac through a web browser. Some browsers, such as Internet Explorer, are not supported at all. 

Candidate experience and company branding: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
Your company’s intro or outro video	Yes	Yes
Assessments branded with your company logo and colors	Yes	Yes
Customizable invitation and rejection emails	Yes	Yes
No login required for candidates	Yes	No
Mobile friendly	Yes	No
Help and support for candidates	Yes	No
Typical assessment length	10-50 minutes	N/A
Qualifying questions prior to assessment	Yes	N/A

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Enterprise and startup friendliness

To effectively identify top talent for your business, you need pre-employment testing software that can keep up with the changing demands of your organization. 

For small businesses and startups, the platform should offer data compliance and various candidate invite options that cater to their specific needs. 

Larger enterprises require more advanced features, such as ATS integrations and API access, to streamline their large-scale recruitment processes.

TestGorilla’s enterprise and startup friendliness

TestGorilla offers plans to suit businesses of all sizes, including a free plan for those who only need to hire a small number of employees per year. 

Medium-sized companies can benefit from the scalable pay-as-you-go model, while larger enterprises can choose a fully customized plan.

Integration with several popular ATS platforms is seamless. Enterprise-level companies with internal ATS software can take advantage of the API. Plus, TestGorilla is GDPR-compliant.

Testinvite’s enterprise and startup friendliness

Testinvite has a simple role-based rights management system where several administrators can be set up to manage tests. And like TestGorilla, it’s also GDPR-compliant.

However, there are no integrations available with popular LMS or ATS platforms. The only option for integrating with external systems is using Testinvite’s API, which costs $950 per year and requires custom code to be written. 

Enterprise and startup friendliness: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
ATS integration	Yes	No
Multiple users and role-based rights management	Yes	Yes
GDPR compliant	Yes	Yes
Multiple candidate invitation options	Yes	Yes
Public link to invite candidates	Yes	No
Public links for each candidate source	Yes	No
Bulk invite candidates (CSV/XLSX upload)	Yes	No
Track candidate stages from invited to hired	Yes	No
API access	Yes	No

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Quality control

To ensure the accuracy of candidate testing, it’s essential to have strict quality-control measures in place that eliminate errors and bias.

A reliable pre-employment screening process must include scientifically validated tests and thorough quality checks. These measures guarantee the precision of results and increase the reliability of the hiring process.

TestGorilla’s quality-control processes

TestGorilla undertakes an extensive 28-step quality-control process for all its pre-employment tests. 

The process includes peer reviews, sample testing, copywriter reviews, and psychometrician reviews, which all ensure accurate and relevant tests.

TestGorilla takes prompt action by retiring any questions that may have become overexposed, safeguarding the tests against web leaks. 

Testinvite’s quality-control processes

Testinvite doesn’t provide information regarding its quality-control processes. Users must create most of the tests from scratch, and Testinvite doesn’t offer anything to ensure these tests are of a high standard.

Quality control: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
Proprietary algorithms that continuously improve the quality of each test	Yes	No
Extensive quality checks before tests go live	Yes	No
Questions replaced after reaching exposure limit	Yes	No
Customer feedback used to improve tests	Yes	No
Test-taker feedback used to improve tests	Yes	No

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Anti-cheating measures

Robust anti-cheating measures ensure that candidates don’t gain an unfair advantage during pre-employment testing. These measures are critical in preserving the accuracy and reliability of test results.

TestGorilla’s anti-cheating measures

TestGorilla has extensive anti-cheating measures. These include webcam screenshots (with permission), IP address monitoring, and blocking copy and paste during tests.

TestGorilla also uses a large question pool and randomizes questions. It detects when candidates move their mouse away from the test window, and you can set time limits on tests so candidates don’t have the option to look up answers online.

Testinvite’s anti-cheating measures

Testinvite locks candidates’ screens so they can’t move away from the test window. Plus, screens and webcams can be recorded and checked later by human proctors. 

The platform uses an AI system with a cheat detection algorithm that flags tests showing unusual activity. It’s also possible to perform live proctoring, monitoring candidates while they take their tests. 

Tests can be configured to have randomized questions, time limits, and start times. In addition, browser features such as copy and paste, spell check, and translation can be disabled during tests.

Anti-cheating measures: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
IP address logging (to avoid multiple attempts by the same candidate)	Yes	N/A
Logging of candidate location	Yes	N/A
Webcam snapshots (with the option to turn on/off)	Yes	Yes
Full-screen mode detection (to avoid research during the test)	Yes	Yes
Randomized questions per test	Yes	Yes
Large question pool for each test	Yes (100+)	N/A
Questions and answers not visible to employers to protect test integrity	Yes	No
Time limit on tests/questions	Yes	Yes
Copy-paste disabled	Yes	Yes

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Reporting and analytics

After assessments are completed, reporting and analytics tools can convert candidate data into valuable insights, enabling informed hiring decisions. 

Analytics provides a condensed overview of the data collected for each candidate, enabling you to scrutinize and use the information to determine which individuals are better suited to the position.

TestGorilla’s reporting and analytics features

TestGorilla provides various reports with recruitment KPIs that can assist you in streamlining your recruitment process. These reports include a comprehensive view of all tests and individual candidate results.

The platform incorporates a scoring benchmark to help you effortlessly rank applicants and distinguish top-performing candidates. You can download these reports in various formats, such as PDF, CSV, or Excel, to suit your specific needs.

TestGorilla’s reports are designed to be easy to understand, and they can be customized to your requirements. You can add your own comments and ratings, which can aid future discussions with your hiring team.

Testinvite’s reporting and analytics features

Testinvite’s search and filter feature can retrieve a list of test sessions based on criteria such as date, status, label, and score. From there, a short summary report can be generated with a table that lists the test results. 

Results can be viewed in several different reports. The radar chart, for example, provides a visual representation of the test-taker’s scores in each section, and the comparison chart shows how they performed compared to the population as a whole.

These reports can be exported in CSV and Excel format for further analysis.  

Reporting and analytics: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
PDF reports of assessments and individual candidates	Yes	N/A
Excel and CSV reports of assessments and individual candidates	Yes	Yes
Comprehensive overview of all current and past candidates	Yes	Yes
Scoring benchmarks for candidates (including percentile rank scoring)	Yes	Yes
Add your ratings and personal notes for candidates	Yes	No

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Customer support

Good pre-employment testing platforms should offer several customer support options. These can include phone support, live chat, tickets, emails, and an online knowledge base.

It’s important to choose a platform with excellent customer support so you can quickly get answers to any questions you have about the process.

TestGorilla’s customer support

TestGorilla provides support for both hiring teams and candidates through email, live chat, and an online help center. 

The help center offers easily accessible solutions to queries. Moreover, business plan clients receive a comprehensive onboarding tour to familiarize all hiring team members with the platform and its features. 

This facilitates the easy and efficient creation of assessments and the effective screening of candidates.

Testinvite’s customer support

Testinvite offers support via phone, live chat, WhatsApp, and email. Most support options have a turnaround time of 1-2 business days. It’s also possible to book a 15-minute live web conferencing session with technical support most weekdays.

Testinvite has around 30 tutorial videos on YouTube that detail how to build tests and how to use specific features of the software. There’s also a limited FAQ on its website discussing several ways to use the system.

Customer support: Comparison chart at a glance

	TestGorilla	Testinvite
Live chat	Yes	Yes
Help center	Yes	Yes
Email support	Yes	Yes
Training and onboarding tour	Yes	No
Phone assistance	No	Yes

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Pricing

Typically, pre-employment testing platforms provide users with monthly subscription options that provide access to specific tests or features. Alternatively, some platforms offer annual payment options, and a few even have a free trial or free plan.

TestGorilla’s pricing

TestGorilla has four annual pricing plans designed to meet the needs of businesses of all sizes.

• The Free (forever) plan offers lifetime access to 10 of TestGorilla’s most popular tests 
• Pay as you go at $312 per year provides access to more than 300 tests and unlimited account users
• Scale at $3,900 per year includes everything in the Pay as you go package, along with customizable tests, PDF reports for candidates, ATS integrations, and more 
• Business at $26,400 per year includes everything in the Scale plan, plus a customized onboarding demo, API access for custom integrations, and more

TestGorilla can also create custom packages tailored to the individual needs of hiring managers or recruiters.

Testinvite’s pricing

Testinvite’s pricing is relatively complex, with many options. Typically, you purchase credits that are valid for three years. 

Credits cost $0.40 each, and buyers must buy at least 250 credits at a time. There’s a discount for purchasing multiple credits in one go, for example, up to 50% off when 10,000 credits are purchased as a bundle.

Credits are spent on Testinvite tests and features. The more features added, the more credits each test costs. For example:

• Basic test: 1 credit
• Webcam video recording: add 8 credits
• AI analysis for cheating attempts: add 3 credits
• Screen recording: add 8 credits
• Log test-taker’s actions: add 1.5 credits
• Live chat: add 1 credit
• Advanced reporting: add 1.5 credits
• Invite test taker by email: add 0.25 credits

This means that each test taken can cost up to $11. Beyond this, there are additional fees for using pre-existing tests from the Testinvite marketplace. 

Each test costs a different number of credits and has other extra fees, such as royalties and exam software usage fees, too. Overall, it’s quite a complicated pricing system.

Pricing: Comparison chart at a glance

TestGorilla		Testinvite
Plan	Price (billed annually)	Plan	Price
Free	$0	No free plan
Pay as you go	$26 per month	Pay as you go	$0.20-$0.40 per credit
Scale	$325 per month
Business	$2,200 per month

TestGorilla vs. Testinvite: Ease of use

A pre-employment testing platform’s effectiveness lies in its ability to provide straightforward and easy-to-use assessments. 

Selecting a suitable prescreening service requires prioritizing a seamless user experience. It’s crucial to choose a platform that boasts intuitive design, mobile compatibility, and effortless test creation tools.

TestGorilla’s ease of use

TestGorilla is a user-friendly platform for employers and candidates. The simple UI and navigation make it easy to create and send assessments quickly. 

TestGorilla’s platform is intuitive and efficient, with bulk candidate invites and HR software integrations. Assessments can be streamlined with automatic scoring and report creation, too. 

TestGorilla prioritizes user experience with a mobile-first design and customizable branding. In addition, ATS integrations, API access, and bulk actions simplify recruiters’ workflows.

Testinvite’s ease of use

Building tests using Testinvite isn’t particularly easy. There’s little guidance in the user interface, so new users will typically need to turn to YouTube tutorials. 

Testinvite has several separate pages for assessments, tests, questions, answers, and page content. So, test-builders will frequently find themselves jumping between several web pages, slowing the creation process.

For test-takers, Testinvite is quite restrictive. Tests can’t be performed by Internet Explorer users, for example, and there’s almost no mobile app functionality.

Conclusion: TestGorilla vs. Testinvite 

TestGorilla outperforms Testinvite on just about every count. For one, it has significantly more tests from which to choose. 

TestGorilla offers a better candidate experience with custom company branding. It’s easier for hiring teams to build custom assessments, and the pricing structure is much simpler. 

TestGorilla performs extensive quality control on its tests, whereas Testinvite doesn’t make these features apparent at all. Plus, TestGorilla has a much more intuitive and powerful user interface than Testinvite. 

Overall, TestGorilla is almost certainly the better option for any company looking to perform pre-employment testing.

Streamline your hiring process with pre-employment testing 

Elevate your hiring game with pre-employment testing, the ultimate accelerator of your recruitment process. 

With a multitude of benefits, including unbiased evaluation of candidates’ aptitudes, personalities, and skills, pre-employment testing enables you to confidently pinpoint the best person for the job.

TestGorilla enables you to streamline your recruitment efforts, efficiently identifying top candidates and saving valuable time and money.
Contact us today to schedule a complimentary 30-minute live demo with a member of our friendly sales team.

Discover how TestGorilla can help you quickly and efficiently find your perfect candidate.